I've been thinking about what Ben said in my tutorial about applying my illustrations in an editorial context, and thought that I definitely need to mock it up. So I found an article from GQ about the debate about trump having small hands meaning he had a small dick and applied my illustrations. I thought I should have a combination of full page and spot illustrations to see what works best. I quite like the full image, although I don't think my illustration is really appropriate for the GQ audience, it does link to the article. I think that editorial should be something to definitely consider in the future, which is a really weird thing to say considering I hated it last year. It shows how much your work can change within a year, which makes me excited for next year!
Not sure if this is definitely editorial, but I wanted to see how else I could apply my illustrations successfully. I thought maybe for an anti-campaign using billboards? I think my illustrations work quite well with the text and having hand drawn images instead of photos (which people usually use for campaigns) would work better to catch people's eye. I think this idea is something that definitely could be expanded on, but is a bit too late for me to do anything about now which is annoying...
AMY ON 7TH MAY - I've just reread this, and maybe dropping the c bomb wouldn't be appropriate to be seen in a busy town centre shown in the picture. If I were to do this campaign then I would use my appropriate language for my audience.
No comments:
Post a Comment